
One of the most fundamental principles in American immigration law is under challenge right now — and the outcome will affect millions of families across the United States.
On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to stop recognizing U.S. citizenship for children born on American soil to parents who are in the country without legal status or on temporary visas. The order — a direct challenge to what has been the settled interpretation of the 14th Amendment for over 150 years — immediately triggered federal lawsuits across the country.
As of 2026, the case has reached the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court's decision will be one of the most consequential rulings on citizenship in American history.
If you have a U.S.-born child, are expecting a child, or are helping a family member navigate this issue, here is what the current legal status means and what you should do right now.
Birthright citizenship — known legally as jus soli, or "right of the soil" — is the principle that any person born on U.S. soil is automatically a U.S. citizen, regardless of the immigration status of their parents.
This principle is rooted in the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, which states:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
For over 150 years, federal courts, the State Department, and every administration — Democratic and Republican — have interpreted this clause to grant citizenship to virtually every person born on U.S. soil.
The United States is one of approximately 30 countries in the world that recognizes birthright citizenship. It is part of what makes the United States unique among developed nations.
The January 2025 executive order directed federal agencies to refuse to issue passports, recognize citizenship, or extend federal benefits based on birthright citizenship to:
Under this order, a child born to a mother on an F-1 student visa and a father on an H-1B work visa would potentially not be recognized as a U.S. citizen — even if both parents are legally present in the country.
The executive order has not taken effect. Within days of being signed, multiple federal courts issued injunctions blocking the order from being implemented while litigation proceeds.
The legal challenge worked its way through the courts rapidly. In 2025, both the First Circuit and the Ninth Circuit upheld the injunctions, finding that the executive order likely violates the 14th Amendment. The administration then sought emergency relief from the Supreme Court — not to enforce the order outright, but to narrow the scope of the nationwide injunctions.
In a significant June 2025 ruling, the Supreme Court held in Trump v. CASA that nationwide injunctions issued by individual district courts are impermissible — a ruling that limited how broadly lower courts could block executive action. However, the Court did not rule on the substance of birthright citizenship itself. The constitutional question — whether the 14th Amendment requires birthright citizenship — remains to be decided.
As of mid-2026, the merits case is before the Supreme Court. A final ruling on whether the executive order is constitutionally permissible is expected before the end of the 2025-2026 term.
Bottom line: Birthright citizenship is still the law today. Children born on U.S. soil are still U.S. citizens. But the legal landscape is shifting, and the Supreme Court's ruling on the merits will be decisive.
If the Supreme Court ultimately rules that the executive order is constitutional — a significant if — the consequences would be profound:
Legal scholars across the ideological spectrum have noted that overturning birthright citizenship would require either a Supreme Court ruling reversing 150 years of precedent or a constitutional amendment — the latter requiring a two-thirds vote of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of states.
The executive order would affect several categories of families if it is upheld:
Families where one or both parents entered or remained in the U.S. without authorization would be most directly affected. Children in these families have historically been U.S. citizens by birth. Under the proposed change, they would not be.
This is a category that surprises many people. Under the executive order's language, children born to parents on F-1 student visas, H-1B work visas, B-1/B-2 tourist visas, TPS, or parolees would also be excluded from birthright citizenship — even though their parents are in the country with government authorization.
The administration has characterized part of the motivation for the order as addressing "birth tourism" — the practice of traveling to the United States specifically to give birth and obtain citizenship for a child. Legal challenges have argued that the order is far too broad and sweeps in millions of families who have no connection to birth tourism.
Even though the executive order is not currently in effect, there are concrete steps families should take now:
If you have a child who was born in the United States, obtain a certified U.S. birth certificate and apply for a U.S. passport now, before any ruling changes the landscape. Existing documentation issued under current law creates a record that is difficult to retroactively challenge.
A U.S. passport is the strongest evidence of citizenship. If your U.S.-born child does not already have a passport, apply now. Passports are currently being issued under existing birthright citizenship rules.
If you are pregnant and living in the United States on a temporary visa or without legal status, consult with an immigration attorney before your child is born. Understanding what documentation to obtain, what applications to file, and what the current law requires can protect your child's rights.
The order is blocked. Citizenship is still being granted at birth under current law. But the Supreme Court's ruling could change this within months. Taking protective steps now — while the current rule is in effect — is far easier than trying to establish rights after the landscape changes.
The executive order explicitly states it applies only to children born on or after the effective date of the order. It does not purport to strip citizenship from people who were already recognized as citizens under prior law.
However, legal experts have raised serious questions about whether the administration could attempt future action affecting those already born — and the Supreme Court's ruling on the underlying constitutional question will shape what is legally possible.
If your child was born in the United States before any potential change takes effect, obtain certified documentation of that birth now. A certified birth certificate, a Social Security number, and a U.S. passport together create a strong evidentiary record.
The birthright citizenship debate touches something fundamental about what it means to be American. For 155 years, the 14th Amendment has made the answer simple: if you are born here, you belong here.
Whether that principle survives the current legal challenge will be decided by nine justices in Washington. But the outcome will be felt in families across Tampa Bay, across Florida, and across the country.
At Ragheb Immigration Law, we are closely monitoring the litigation and are prepared to advise families on how to protect their children's status as the law evolves. If you have a U.S.-born child and have questions about documentation, citizenship records, or your family's broader immigration situation, contact our office today.
A consultation now could protect your child's future, no matter which way the Supreme Court rules.